the little weasel responds to your e mail,firstly one can only assume your education was non existent as your spelling is appalling.You are also a coward who hides behind e mails which are obviously written by a very yellow spineless idiot who is envious and jealous of a proper man who is very successful in all he does in life.One must therefore assume you are an ex member of staff OR a partner of one of the ex directors,sour grapes come to mind !!!! My door is open please come and see me to discuss your issues and whilst your here you can peruse our client file and see that we are a very smart company with a 99% SATISFACTION RATE.I have also taken a print off of your silly e mail and delivered it to the cafe in town who does milk shakes , that lady knows a private investigator who is excellent at I.T !!!kind regards THE BOSS

**FOULBUSINESS HAS REMOVED THREATENING CONTENT FROM THIS COMMENT**

**YOU MUST NOT USE THREATENING OR POTENTIALLY THREATENING CONTEXT ON FOULBUSINESS**

"The Boss", we are writing this on here publicly because we can't confirm your email address is correct.

I have read your posting and will respond by each sentence.

(A)You are correct in saying that information on-line which tarnishes the reputation of a business or individual is in act of libel. However if the information is true, it is not libel. Truth is considered a complete defense in a defamation lawsuit. It is not slander. Slander is something which is physically spoken.

(B)FoulBusiness under absolutely no circumstances will ever hand over the details of the author who wrote this review, or any other FoulBusiness user as per our terms of service and privacy policy, both of which can be found at the bottom of this page. FoulBusiness refuses to hand over this information to anyone because nobody has any right to obtain others' information.

(C)FoulBusiness will not be contacting you by phone as we have already tried to converse with you via email to no avail. We sent another email to you today (18/01/2011) which you have failed to respond to also.

(D)In regards to verifying content, can we point out section 6 of our terms of service, in particular the following paragraph: "You acknowledge that FoulBusiness UK has no obligation to monitor Content. FoulBusiness UK and its designees shall have the right (but not the obligation) in their sole discretion to refuse, move or remove any Content that is available via the Services that violates the TOS or is otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of any Content, including any reliance on the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of such Content"

(E)In regards to issuing court proceedings, please note that you have failed to respond to our email multiple times. If you had responded to those emails, FoulBusiness would have worked with you in removing this review. One of the processes of removing a review is often completing a Defamation Form. The defamation form is essentially a short version your speech in the courts which FoulBusiness will look at it. This takes less than 10 minutes to complete. The courts will often require that you fill out a similar form anyway, often only taking action if the defendant (us) has received the form in writing. Please note that filling in the FoulBusiness Defamation Form does not require a hand written copy of the form sent by postal mail (email is acceptable).

(F)FoulBusiness has no intention to read books regarding this matter.

TO CONCLUDE:-

FoulBusiness would much prefer that we settle this matter between ourselves, there is no need for court action, solicitors or lawyers to get involved. To get this matter solved, and follow the instructions we would have sent to you via email (had we heard a response), please go to http://foulbusiness.co.uk/content/reporting-a-defamatory-review.

Please respond with your thoughts regarding this matter.
Administration

To whom it may concern
We act on behalf of UK GAS & OIL LTD. we are libel lawyers, our client has instructed us to act and remove the very serious and damaging allegations that have been made available to the general public on your website by individual/s currently unknown. They are misconceived and formulaic allegations and are inaccurate and defamatory
of our client and should not be further published or disseminated. Furthermore our client has produced evidence which contradicts your clients comments. Our client holds every professional qualification for his chosen industry and has had some thirty years experiencein his chosen field of expertise. He is a very succesful man in his own right. All of his staff also hold qualifications for their chosen fields. We are satisfied that your client can be sued for libel. Our client has employed the services of a private investigator to enlighten him who is behind these inaccurate and defamatory remarks which have been published on YOUR website. The plumbing and heating industry is blighted by cowboys, it is very cut throat,the business Embers your one stop plumbing and heating shop has been around for 10 years. It has achieved a very high percentage of satisfied customers. On the basis of this and looking towards the future the business is relocating to a superstore on the high street. It continues to go from strength to strength. Our client readily admits that from late 2008 to late 2010 there were problems within the business owing to, two lazy incompetant individuals which were unfortunately employed by the company for way too long. This problem has now been rectified. Once again we have seen ample proof that the current satisfaction rate is very high. Has in all walks of life not all customers will be happy with the level of service given. Banks,communication and airline companies seem to bear the brunt of customer moans and groans however it has got to be the attack in this instance is also of a personel matter we are therefore surprised that Foulbusiness UK has allowed personel comments to be published into the public domain! We are also dismayed that you have failed in your duty of care to establish if your clients comments were true and accurate.We would now ask that these comments are removed immediately and an apology is written to our client. Failure to do so will result in libel action being taken. Our deadline is by close of business Friday 28th January 2011.
Yours sincerely
Carter-Ruck

I left the comment at 19 Jan 2011 - 14:02, I would like to point out that I have never called called you a 'weasel' (perhaps you need to be made aware that there isn't actually a person called 'anonymous' who is writing the comments on this site), and so you are actually the one who is commiting libel! Also it is you only who has written personal comments and insults (perhaps I'll contact Carter-Ruck).

You have also made threats.

Also speaking of solictors, I've passed your details onto Bruce Springsteen who will be in touch shortly regarding the unsolicited use of his pseudonym.

THE CUSTOMER

PS, I find it very very hard to believe that a solicitor would say that the comments on this site are 'slander', as that relates to spoken word.

And it would be an offence for the site to pass any personal details on to you under the data protection act, have you really contacted a solitor?

Reading through the comments, you have commited far more libel than any other contributor on this page!

THE CUSTOMER